rskanth
07-05 03:14 PM
Yes, the AP is valid for one year and for as many visits as you want. Same thing happened with me. You can travel again with the stamped AP.
wallpaper Long Hairstyles With Layers
bijualex29
09-12 09:40 AM
Can a Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions have the power to pass any kind of immigration bills.
kirupa
11-02 09:41 PM
Thanks - added :)
2011 Short Layered Haircuts
mothukuri
08-14 04:18 PM
Guys,
Have anybody feeling the big difference between Texas and Nebraska service center processing? Texas is giving greencards and June filers most of them have got EAD and Advanced Paroles. Is immigrationvoice doing anything to escalate the situation.
Nebraska June filers, post your updates here.
Have anybody feeling the big difference between Texas and Nebraska service center processing? Texas is giving greencards and June filers most of them have got EAD and Advanced Paroles. Is immigrationvoice doing anything to escalate the situation.
Nebraska June filers, post your updates here.
more...
snhn
04-24 04:46 PM
Hello all
I have a question. My wife called TSC today, and she talked to one of the most rudest person in the world. unfortunatelly she forgot to write his information down.
Baiscally, while she was talking my son was bothering her and cryin in a low pitch. The bastard TSC agen had the odesity to tell my wife to take the kid away, and htat is he dying.. you should got help him. Obviouslly he was not saying that because he was nice. He started to laguh. I am so furious right now.
So my question is can we find out who this agent was by callin INS and asking them who opened her file last. I sure would love to have few minutes with him one on one. Show him what we do to peace of crap like him if we was back home.
Anyhows, appreciate your answers.
I have a question. My wife called TSC today, and she talked to one of the most rudest person in the world. unfortunatelly she forgot to write his information down.
Baiscally, while she was talking my son was bothering her and cryin in a low pitch. The bastard TSC agen had the odesity to tell my wife to take the kid away, and htat is he dying.. you should got help him. Obviouslly he was not saying that because he was nice. He started to laguh. I am so furious right now.
So my question is can we find out who this agent was by callin INS and asking them who opened her file last. I sure would love to have few minutes with him one on one. Show him what we do to peace of crap like him if we was back home.
Anyhows, appreciate your answers.
NANO3
11-10 09:55 PM
nice pixel drawings, its still a little cut and the tree isn't 3D
nice job otherwise
nice job otherwise
more...
Blog Feeds
01-15 11:20 AM
This is commendable and also an interesting development because it means that the pro-immigration community is essentially saying that it is necessary to allow one group to receive an important immigration benefit out of lockstep with comprehensive immigration reform. Of course, the circumstances are extreme and allowing Haitians in the US - those here legally and illegally - the ability to stay and work here in order to help their country on its long road to recovery is crucial. Incidentally, the anti-immigrants at FAIR issued an interesting press release today showing their great humanity. They want to grant TPS to...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/01/la-raza-calls-for-tps-for-haitians.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/01/la-raza-calls-for-tps-for-haitians.html)
2010 long length layered hairstyles
blazes
08-04 10:50 AM
I like it. Mabey put a small lime on it somewhere though? That'd be cool.
more...
dpsg
02-26 08:32 PM
Guys I missed the conference call , But interested to know what happened &
if some key decisions made.
Called IV, But the person who answered was busy answering similar questions from other member.We don't want to waste precious time of IV leaders by calling indvidualy.
If someone who attended can summarize for the benifit of those who missed, It would be great.
Also does members of other nationalities(non Indians) also attended the conference call.. Hopefully IV is striving to become voice of all EB GC aspirants. Everyone will gain from joint effort and IV will have resources to do meaningful things.
great jobs guys .. wish you all the best.
if some key decisions made.
Called IV, But the person who answered was busy answering similar questions from other member.We don't want to waste precious time of IV leaders by calling indvidualy.
If someone who attended can summarize for the benifit of those who missed, It would be great.
Also does members of other nationalities(non Indians) also attended the conference call.. Hopefully IV is striving to become voice of all EB GC aspirants. Everyone will gain from joint effort and IV will have resources to do meaningful things.
great jobs guys .. wish you all the best.
hair long hairstyles layers bangs
pttuanzhang
06-02 07:48 PM
You're right, I really admire
more...
jainGC
07-20 03:02 PM
Hi Gurus,
I have approved H1 for 3 years. I need to travel to India, but my AP is in Process. What I have heard is that it takes more than 2-3 months to get the AP approved. What are my options?
- Can I leave the country and get H1 stamp while AP is in process.
- Should I wait till AP gets approved?
- Is it OK to travel while while AP is in process?
Please advice?
I have approved H1 for 3 years. I need to travel to India, but my AP is in Process. What I have heard is that it takes more than 2-3 months to get the AP approved. What are my options?
- Can I leave the country and get H1 stamp while AP is in process.
- Should I wait till AP gets approved?
- Is it OK to travel while while AP is in process?
Please advice?
hot Famous Long Layered Hairstyles
xtronics
01-12 12:37 PM
How long does it take tio get the I-140 approved in premium processing?
more...
house Hairstyle: Long layers
freddyCR
March 2nd, 2005, 08:38 PM
Not very sure about this one...what do you think?
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/500/medium/stray1-1_BW8x6L.jpg
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/500/medium/stray1-1_BW8x6L.jpg
tattoo short layered hairstyle
laddu0
04-06 09:35 AM
Hi Guys:
My wife is out of country from October 2010. She was working on H1B. After birth of our son, she went to India for 6 month vacation. Will there be any issues if she re-enters US using H1B as she is having a job to continue with her employer.
What are all the documents I need to take.
Please advice.
Thanks
LADDU
My wife is out of country from October 2010. She was working on H1B. After birth of our son, she went to India for 6 month vacation. Will there be any issues if she re-enters US using H1B as she is having a job to continue with her employer.
What are all the documents I need to take.
Please advice.
Thanks
LADDU
more...
pictures Short Layered Haircuts
lvinaykumar
03-01 06:34 PM
Dont see much activity?
dresses Long Hairstyles Short Layers.
a_paradkar
07-27 09:27 AM
I am currently working for Company A and would like to join company B on EAD. I have a valid EAD and would use it to switch over.
My question is
1. what document's are needed to send to USCIS for AC 21 for/from company B.
2. Do I need to send any documents?
Thanks for you
My question is
1. what document's are needed to send to USCIS for AC 21 for/from company B.
2. Do I need to send any documents?
Thanks for you
more...
makeup short-layered-hairstyle; Long
AnotherDog
08-31 03:49 PM
Yes in Montreal, Canada on Aug 26th, 2009. All is well. I got my h1b visa renewed for 3 years. They had to do electronic followup since my LIN is not found in PIMS. But I got my passport, visa next day at 3pm.
girlfriend 1984 blonde long hairstyle
prasadn
06-22 04:27 PM
My wife currently is on an H1-B visa and she also has EAD/AP based on my I-485 filing. Due to personal reasons she plans to quit her job soon (next 2-3 weeks or so). What will be her status? Should we be filing COS to H-4? Can we get a RFE for proof of her employment when I-485 is processed?
Thanks,
Prasad
Thanks,
Prasad
hairstyles Jessica Simpson Long Hairstyle
Macaca
07-29 06:03 PM
Bet on India (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/28/AR2007072800999.html) The Bush administration presses forward with a nuclear agreement -- and hopes for a strategic partnership. July 29, 2007
IN LARGE PART, modern U.S. nuclear nonproliferation policy began with India. India received U.S. aid under the "Atoms for Peace" program of the early Cold War era -- only to lose its U.S. fuel supply because India, which had refused to sign the 1968 nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), exploded a nuclear "device" in 1974. Decades of U.S. noncooperation with India's civilian atomic energy program were intended to teach India, and the world, a lesson: You will not prosper if you go nuclear outside the system of international safeguards.
Friday marked another step toward the end of that policy -- also with India. The Bush administration and New Delhi announced the principles by which the United States will resume sales of civilian nuclear fuel and technology to India, as promised by President Bush in July 2005. The fine print of the agreement, which must still be approved by the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group and by Congress, has not yet been released. But the big picture is clear: The administration is betting that the benefits to the United States and the world of a "strategic partnership" with India outweigh the risks of a giant exception to the old rules of the nonproliferation game.
There are good reasons to make the bet. India is a booming democracy of more than 1 billion people, clearly destined to play a growing role on the world stage. It can help the United States as a trading partner and as a strategic counterweight to China and Islamic extremists. If India uses more nuclear energy, it will emit less greenhouse gas. Perhaps most important, India has developed its own nuclear arsenal without selling materials or know-how to other potentially dangerous states. This is more than can be said for Pakistan, home of the notorious A.Q. Khan nuclear network.
You can call this a double standard, as some of the agreement's critics do: one set of rules for countries we like, another for those we don't. Or you can call it realism: The agreement provides for more international supervision of India's nuclear fuel cycle than there would be without it. For example, it allows India to reprocess atomic fuel but at a new facility under International Atomic Energy Agency supervision, to protect against its diversion into weapons. The case for admitting India to the nuclear club is based on the plausible notion that the political character of a nuclear-armed state can be as important, or more important, than its signature on the NPT. North Korea, a Stalinist dictatorship, went nuclear while a member of the NPT; the Islamic Republic of Iran appears headed down the same road. Yet India's democratic system and its manifest interest in joining the global free-market economy suggest that it will behave responsibly.
Or so it must be hoped. The few details of the agreement released Friday suggest that it is very favorable to India indeed, while skating close to the edge of U.S. law. For example, the United States committed to helping India accumulate a nuclear fuel stockpile, thus insulating New Delhi against the threat, provided for by U.S. law, of a supply cutoff in the unlikely event that India resumes weapons testing. Congress is also asking appropriate questions about India's military-to-military contacts with Iran and about New Delhi's stubborn habit of attending meetings of "non-aligned" countries at which Cuba, Venezuela and others bash the United States. As Congress considers this deal, India might well focus on what it can do to show that it, too, thinks of the new strategic partnership with Washington as a two-way street.
IN LARGE PART, modern U.S. nuclear nonproliferation policy began with India. India received U.S. aid under the "Atoms for Peace" program of the early Cold War era -- only to lose its U.S. fuel supply because India, which had refused to sign the 1968 nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), exploded a nuclear "device" in 1974. Decades of U.S. noncooperation with India's civilian atomic energy program were intended to teach India, and the world, a lesson: You will not prosper if you go nuclear outside the system of international safeguards.
Friday marked another step toward the end of that policy -- also with India. The Bush administration and New Delhi announced the principles by which the United States will resume sales of civilian nuclear fuel and technology to India, as promised by President Bush in July 2005. The fine print of the agreement, which must still be approved by the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group and by Congress, has not yet been released. But the big picture is clear: The administration is betting that the benefits to the United States and the world of a "strategic partnership" with India outweigh the risks of a giant exception to the old rules of the nonproliferation game.
There are good reasons to make the bet. India is a booming democracy of more than 1 billion people, clearly destined to play a growing role on the world stage. It can help the United States as a trading partner and as a strategic counterweight to China and Islamic extremists. If India uses more nuclear energy, it will emit less greenhouse gas. Perhaps most important, India has developed its own nuclear arsenal without selling materials or know-how to other potentially dangerous states. This is more than can be said for Pakistan, home of the notorious A.Q. Khan nuclear network.
You can call this a double standard, as some of the agreement's critics do: one set of rules for countries we like, another for those we don't. Or you can call it realism: The agreement provides for more international supervision of India's nuclear fuel cycle than there would be without it. For example, it allows India to reprocess atomic fuel but at a new facility under International Atomic Energy Agency supervision, to protect against its diversion into weapons. The case for admitting India to the nuclear club is based on the plausible notion that the political character of a nuclear-armed state can be as important, or more important, than its signature on the NPT. North Korea, a Stalinist dictatorship, went nuclear while a member of the NPT; the Islamic Republic of Iran appears headed down the same road. Yet India's democratic system and its manifest interest in joining the global free-market economy suggest that it will behave responsibly.
Or so it must be hoped. The few details of the agreement released Friday suggest that it is very favorable to India indeed, while skating close to the edge of U.S. law. For example, the United States committed to helping India accumulate a nuclear fuel stockpile, thus insulating New Delhi against the threat, provided for by U.S. law, of a supply cutoff in the unlikely event that India resumes weapons testing. Congress is also asking appropriate questions about India's military-to-military contacts with Iran and about New Delhi's stubborn habit of attending meetings of "non-aligned" countries at which Cuba, Venezuela and others bash the United States. As Congress considers this deal, India might well focus on what it can do to show that it, too, thinks of the new strategic partnership with Washington as a two-way street.
sab
11-06 02:59 PM
How much time does it take for 485 to get approved with a visa number available. I applied for 485 after my i-140 was approved. Does the priority date have anything to do with processing for 485?
rookie123
10-11 08:12 PM
I am a software engineer who just received the EAD. Does this mean I can now start working as a Barista at Starbucks? What does an EAD really give me?
No comments:
Post a Comment